Review Details
Reviewer has chosen to be Anonymous
Overall Impression: Average
Suggested Decision: Undecided
Technical Quality of the paper: Average
Presentation: Weak
Reviewer`s confidence: High
Significance: Moderate significance
Background: Reasonable
Novelty: Unable to judge
Data availability: All used and produced data (if any) are FAIR and openly available in established data repositories
Length of the manuscript: The authors need to elaborate more on certain aspects and the manuscript should therefore be extended (if the general length limit is already reached, I urge the editor to allow for an exception)
Summary of paper in a few sentences:
The paper proposes the GrapesNet dataset, which could be utilized for the development of automatic grape bunch detection and segmentation systems. Four sub-datasets are created; one grape bunch per image, multiple grape bunches per image, Dataset-3 with images taken under natural lighting conditions, and Dataset-4 that was created with artificial environment of the fixed environmental conditions and constant artificial light.
Reasons to accept:
Overall, I found the article to be a valuable contribution to the development of automatic grape bunch detection and segmentation systems, through the creation of the GrapesNet dataset.
Reasons to reject:
* Not justification for creating the one grape bunch per image and multiple grape bunches per image datasets separately
* It would also be helpful to see some evaluations, possibly initial results of a baseline model trained and evaluated on the dataset. The evaluation would help prove your dataset was designed and built well
* The organization of the contents of the article should be improved, and grammatical errors corrected to enhance readability
Nanopublication comments:
Further comments:
2 Comments
Meta-Review by Editor
Submitted by Tobias Kuhn on
The reviewers agree that this is a potentially useful resource worthy of publication, but there are a few things that should be better explained and the presentation of the manuscript needs to be improved. I would therefore like to ask the authors to submit an improved version taking these points into account.
Tobias Kuhn (https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1267-0234)
Withdrawn by the authors
Submitted by Tobias Kuhn on
Upon request by the authors, this submission was withdrawn and is thereby marked as Rejected.