Transitioning “Open Data” from a NOUN to a VERB

Tracking #: 491-1471

Authors:
NameORCID
Aadinarayana VarmaORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8551-3638
Sheevendra Sharma


Submission Type: 

Position Paper

Abstract: 

Research assessment is the process or a metric which aims to assess the impact of the research study. The assessment may include the process that aims in assessing the quality or intellect of a researcher given the notion that qualified researchers are more productive and may drive quality research in the process of Scholarly Communications. Over time, we have become used to equating the quality of the research with the quality or performance of the researcher. The emphasis over publications may encourage unethical practices, which may then be extrapolated to the evolution of problems like, Irreproducibility, Scientific fraud. Over the past century, a myriad of activities has been undertaken or are still being taken to improve the ways by which research can be assessed. Beginning with the original evolution of the Impact Factor and more recently other, Citation metrics, Altmetrics etc. have resulted from this work. In this article, we would like to explore about the myriad of strategies that may play a major role in the cultural transition of Science and Scientists that is still ongoing, and highlight the reasons why we should not only look at research assessment but should also be keen on researcher assessments and differentiate them from one another. Reflecting this, the title of the article signals how the strategies that researchers may need to consider might impact the way they interact with the Open Data movement.

Manuscript: 

Tags: 

  • Reviewed

Data repository URLs: 

The article is already posted on a pre-print server(PeerJ) - https://peerj.com/preprints/3015/

Date of Submission: 

Thursday, June 22, 2017

Date of Decision: 

Thursday, June 22, 2017

Decision: 

Reject (Pre-Screening)


1 Comment

Explanation of rejection without review

You seem to have submitted a document that is not the paper's final version for submission, as the document contains many inline comments. Also the references are not properly formatted. Please resubmit an improved version of this paper.